Patna High CourtL.P.A/1747/2016dismissed

Mosmat Budhiya Devi v. The Research Officer, Consolidation, Head Quarter, Patna And ORS

2018-01-23Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1747 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6127 of 2004 ====================================================== Mosmat Budhiya Devi widow of Late Hardeo Ram, resident of VillageMobarakpur, P.S. Mohania, P.O.- Piparia, Via- Durgawati, District- Kaimur. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Research officer, Consolidation, Head Quarter, Patna & Ors

2. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Rohtas at Sasaram. null null

3. The Consolidation Officer, Anchal - Mohania, District- Kaimur. null null

4. Indar Singh son of Late Sahdeo Singh. null

5. Mosmat Munera Devi widow of Late Tilakdhari Singh.

6. Jhuri Mallah son of Late Ghoor Fekan Mallah.

7. Moti Mallah son of Late Ram Janam Mallah respondent nos. 4 to 7 are residents of Village- Mobarakpur, P.O.- Piparia, Via- Durgawati, P.S. Mohania, District- Kaimur.

8. Murte Shankar Jee, Mutawali Mahabir Singh son of Rup Narain Singh resident of village- Panapur P.S. Mohania, District Kaimur.

9. Raj Nath Chamar.

10. Chandar Chamar

11. Barhu Chamar Respondent No. 9 to 11 are sons of Late Mathura Chamar.

12. Dular Chand son of Sahdeo Chamar Respondents No. 9 to 12 are residents of Village- Mobarkpur, P.O.- Piparia, Via- Durgawari, District- Kaimur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Shrivastava For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 23-01-2018 Heard counsel for the appellant. Perused the impugned order dated 28.07.2016.

The reasons for dismissal of the writ application are two fold, one that an order dated 31.08.1994 passed in Consolidation Revision Case No.2044 of 1986 is sought to be challenged by

Patna High Court LPA No.1747 of 2016(4) dt.23-01-2018 2/2 one of the sons after more than ten years and second that not all the sons have grievance against the decision nor did the father. In view of the same, settled position cannot be unsettled at the asking of the litigant at such belated time. Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- U