Priya Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2980 of 2024 ====================================================== Priya Singh W/o Pawan Kumar, R/o Vill-Madhurapur Bidupur, P.s. Bidupur, Dist-Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 2.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Hajipur, Dist.-Vaishali. 3.
The Branch Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Anwarpur, P.S.- Town, Dist.-Vaishali.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Adv.
:
Mr. Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Adv.
:
Mr. SK Bhatnagar, Adv.
:
MR. Santosh Kumar, Adv.
:
Mr. Krishna Murari Prasad, Adv.
:
Mr. Kumar Shivam Sinha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Addl. Advocate General (12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents, it is specifically stated that the petitioner is required to make the following payments;
Sl.
No.
Particulars Dues A.
Balance installments till June, 2024 Rs. 92,259.71 B.
AFC dues/ delay interest.
Rs. 31,929.48 C.
Future Receivable.
Rs. 1,85,400.00 D.
Repossession charges.
Rs. 8,260.00 E.
Cheque bounce charges.
Rs. 2,000.00 Total Rs. 3,25,849.19
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/ Mahindra and Mahindra Finance has stated that the
Patna High Court CWJC No.2980 of 2024(8) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 vehicle is still with the respondents and in case the petitioner pays the above amounts, they are willing to release the same.
3. Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to clear the above mentioned outstanding dues to the respondent-Finance Limited within a period of four weeks. On payment of the same, the respondent-Finance Company shall release the vehicle. In case the petitioner has any other grievance, he is free to approach the Consumer Court for deficiency of the service.
4. With the above direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
(A. Abhishek Reddy, J) Ayush/- U