Asha Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3241 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12789 of 2013 ====================================================== Asha Gupta, W/O Deo Narayan Gupta, Resident of Village- Mahdeva, P.S. Laukahi, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Atul Prasad.
3.
The Commissioner Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga namely R.K. Khandelwal.
4.
The District Magistrate, Madhubani namely Mr. Shirshit Kapil Ashok. 5.
The District Program Officer, Madhubani namely Binod Kumar Bimal. 6.
The Child Development Programme Officer, Laukahi Block, District Madhubani namely Ritu Gupta.
7.
The Mukhia Gram Panchayat Raj Naraiha, P.S. Laukahi, District Madhubani.
8.
Ruby Kumari W/O Pramod Kumar Sah, Resident of Village- Mahdeba, P.S. Laukahi, District- Madhubani 9.
The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Naraiha, P.S. Laukahi, Distt. Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ugranath Malik, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Manish Kumar, AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-09-2023 Heard Mr. Ugranath Malik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel representing the State.
2. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 4 to 6 and with reference to the averments made therein it is submitted that pursuant to the order of this Court, all
Patna High Court MJC No.3241 of 2017(3) dt.08-09-2023 2/2 the stake holders have been provided the opportunity of hearing and the order has been passed on 05.12.2017 and thus the present contempt petition has become infructuous.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present contempt petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order passed by the Collector, Madhubani in Aaganbari Misc. Case No. 46 of 201617.
4. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties and the order of this Court having been complied with, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
5. Needless to observe that the petitioner is at liberty to assail the order passed by the Collector, Madhubani in Aaganbari Misc. Case No. 46 of 2016-17, if she feels aggrieved. (Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U