Irfan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10543 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2019 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== IRFAN ANSARI Son of Kalamuddin Ansari @ Sawal Miyan Resident of Village - Banjariya Babu Tola, P.S - Banjariya, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner and others named in the FIR allegedly robbed to the informant. Earlier prayer for bail to the petitioner was refused vide order at Annexure-1 with liberty to renew the prayer after framing of the charge. Petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2019.

Submission is that no incriminating material was recovered from possession of the arrested person including the petitioner. Charges have already been framed. Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10543 of 2020(2) dt.05-06-2020 2/2 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Patahi Police Station Case No. 303 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned court below.

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lockdown, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T