Patna High CourtCWJC/16349/2017allowed

Kanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16349 of 2017 =========================================================== Kanti Devi, Wife of Baliram Das @ Baliram Ravidas, Resident of Village- Rasisa, P.S.- Aungari (Pirbigha) District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar.

3. The Collector, Nalanda.

4. The District Supply Officer, Nalanda.

5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Hilsa, District- Nalanda.

6. The Block Supply Officer, Ekangarsarai District- Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lovekush Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-03-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order contained in memo no. 802/Aa dated 23.08.2017 passed by learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa by which the PDS licence of the petitioner being license no. E-45/2007 has been suspended.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the licence of the petitioner, who is a PDS dealer, has been suspended only on the basis of the first information report instituted as Aungari (Pirbigha) P.S. Case No. 59/2017 It is submitted that the conditions for suspension of the licence in terms of Clause 28 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 are not satisfied as the petitioner is neither behind the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16349 of 2017 dt.14-03-2018 bar nor he is fugitive. The petitioner relies upon the order dated 07.03.2017 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWJC No. 16733 of 2016 in which the order of suspension of licence was quashed for similar reasons.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has been heard.

4. Having regard to the nature of the grievance of the petitioner and in view of the order dated 07.03.2017 passed by this Court in CWJC No. 16733 of 2016 in similar circumstances, the impugned order contained in memo no. 802/Aa dated 23.08.2017 passed by learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa (Annexure-2) is hereby quashed. The writ petition stands allowed.

5. Needless to say, the supply of the articles in terms of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 shall be restored to the petitioner without delay.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.03.2018 Transmission Date NA