Anil Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19145 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2020 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== ANIL PRASAD Son of Late Dharm Nath Prasad Resident of Village - Bhediya, P.S. - Gopalganj Town, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pritish Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.PP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case no. 212 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution allegation, in short, is that the accused persons assaulted the informant and others due to which they sustained injuries.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. Co-accused Vijendra @

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19145 of 2021(2) dt.15-12-2021 2/2 Vikesh Prasad has inflicted injury to Anup, which is simple in nature and the said co-accused along with others have already been granted bail by a different co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 214 of 2021. The case of the petitioner stands on better footing to that of the co-accused.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case no. 212 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gopalganj subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U