← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11219/2024bail granted

Krishnabati Singh @ Krishnawati Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-01Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11219 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2019 Thana- AAJAM NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Krishnabati Singh @ Krishnawati Singh, Wife Of Ganesh Singha Resident Of Village- Barduary Dakshin Harishchandrapur, P.S.- Harishchandrapur, District- Malda (West Bengal) ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 3.6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 5.4 litres of liquor from another motorcycle.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11219 of 2024(2) dt.01-03-2024 2/2 seized motorcycle. It is further submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing a crime and thus, would create evidence against himself and hence, would get implicated. It is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his friend Ashok would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged as he was also apprehended at the spot.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judgecum-Exclusive Special Excise Court No.II, Katihar in connection with Ajamnagar P. S. Case No.186 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T