Govind Prajapat @ Govind Prajapati v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 51896 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2014 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Govind Prajapat @ Govind Prajapati, Son of Suresh Prajapat, Resident of Village - Shahpur Pokhara, P.S. Aurangabad Town, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Nr. Singh1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

30-11-2015 Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Deo P.S. Case No. 90 of 2014 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ofcourse, it was a case of road-robbery, the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown and subsequently, during investigation, one of the co-accused was apprehended and he made confession before the police implicating the petitioner. He submits that the said coaccused Sudhir Kumar @ Babloo has already been granted bail by this Court on 09-03-2015, vide Cr.Misc. No. 8762 of 2015. It has also been argued that though the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown, the petitioner is in custody and he was not put on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51896 of 2015 (2) dt.30-11-2015 2/2 T.I.Parade.

Be that as it may, since co-accused, on whose confession petitioner's name has come, has already been granted bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer of bail of petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner namely Govind Prajapat @ Govind Prajapati be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad/concerned court in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 90 of 2014 on condition that one of the bailor must be blood relation of the petitioner and secondly, on each and every date before the trial court the petitioner shall remain physically present. If continuously on two dates, he fails to appear without prior permission of the court below, his bail-bond shall stand automatically cancelled.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T