Janardan Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21470 of 2014 ====================================================== Janardan Chaubey S/O Late Bishwanath Chaubey Resident of villShyampur,P.o-Rampur Daud,P.S-Kochai Kot,Distt.-Gopalganj,retired from the Post of Clerk/Office Assistant,Sone Command Area Development Agency Division,Ara,Head Quater-SCADA,Sone Bhawan ,Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna, Bihar. 2.
The State of Jharkhand,through the Chief Secretary,Ranchi ,Jharkhand 3.
The Secretary,Sone Camand Area Development Plan Water Resource Department,Govt,of Bihar,Patna 4.
The Under Secretary,Govt.of Jharkhand 5.
The Commissioner-cum-Chairman,Sone Comand Area Development Agency,Bihar,Sone-Bhawan,at Patna,Bihar 6.
The Under Secretary,Sone Comand Area Development Agency,Bihar,SoneBhawan,at Patna,Bihar 7.
The Chief Engineer,Sone Comand Area Development Agency,Patna,Bihar 8.
The Executive Engineer,Sone Comand Area Development Agency,Ara Division,Ara,Bhojpur 9.
The Chief Engineer Suvarn Rekha Multipurpose Plan, Chandil Complex, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand 10.
The Executive Engineer,Minor Distribution Division,No.-2,Chandil Complex,Dimna,Jamshedpur,Jharkhand 11.
Under Divisional Officer,Irrigation,Under Division Ghatsheela,Shihbhum,Jharkhand 12.
The Public Information Officer,Water Resource Department,Irrigation Building,Patna 13.
The Assistant Engineer,Sone Comand Area Development Agency,SubDivision Piro,Ara,Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sheo Shankar Pd.,SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no
Patna High Court CWJC No.21470 of 2014(2) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U