Prashant Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13681 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-938 Year-2018 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== PRASHANT KUMAR JHA Son of Sri Gulab Narayan Jha Resident of 401, Kalyani Enclave, Sudarpuram Colony, Opposite RPS Mahila College, Mansarovar, Road No. 3, P.S.- Rupaspur, Distt - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Sri Durganand Mishra Son of Parmanand Mishra Resident of Village - Brahampur, near Braham Asthan, North Tola, P.S.- Manigachi, Distt - Darbhanga, At Present Flat No. 302, Laverna Residency, Rajiv Nagar, Indrapuri, Road No. 1, P.S.- Patliputra, Distt - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party No. 2 vide order dated 03.04.2019 passed by learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City, Patna in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 938 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner for cancellation of anticipatory bail to the Opposite Party No. 2 is that suppressing the fact and on wrong submission he has obtained anticipatory bail from the learned 5th Additional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13681 of 2020(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 Session Judge.

It appears from the order of learned 5th Additional Session Judge that considering the fact that the case relates to money transaction between the parties has granted anticipatory bail to the Opposite Party No. 2 and there is no allegation of misuse of privilege of bail and, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Considering the above, I find no merit in this application, the same is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Vikash/- U T