Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9243 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2020 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== PAPPU YADAV Son of Sahdeo Yadav Resident of Village- Lagar, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP For the informant :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the learned APP for the State. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.68 of 2020 instituted under Section 302/34 of the IPC & 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 24.02.2020 by the informant Rupam Devi.

As per the FIR, informant alleged that on 24.02.2020 at daytime, she along with her husband and 'Bhaisur' was returning from field. The accused persons who were hidden in the wheat field, variously armed surrounded them and caught her husband where upon Pappu Yadav fired upon her husband which hit his back and the bullet came out from chest side. On 'hulla' all accused persons fled away. Local persons assembled there and carried the injured to the village and on way police

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9243 of 2023(2) dt.03-05-2023 2/2 arrived who sent the injured to PHC, Parbatta. He was referred to Sadar Hospital, Khagaria and on way the injured died. As per the FIR, Pappu Yadav was earlier also named in the murder of Subodh Yadav but was given clean chit by police. He was further named in murder of Prakash Yadav and case is presently pending for final adjudication. The petitioner is main assailant in this case and as such this Court is not inclined to extend him any relief and his bail application is accordingly rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year. (Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T