← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3980/2020disposed

Rajesh Kumar v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

2022-07-12Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh,Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3980 of 2020 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar aged about 46 years (M) Son of late Kamaleshwari Singh @ Kamleshwari Mandal, Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S. Bariarpur, DistrictMunger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Regional Manager, 3A, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbanglow Road, Patna.

2.

Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Pipe Line Division) EPRL Pipe Lines, BKPL Head Quarter, Barauni, Begusarai. 3.

Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Pipe Line Division), EPRL Pipe Line Construction Office, Kathalbari, Khanjarpur, Bhagalpur, Bihar. 4.

Anil Prasad Singh, Son of late Parasnath Mandal, and adopted Son of late Chefi Mandal, Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S. Bariyarpur, DistrictMunger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Siyaram Shahi, Advocate Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has preferred the present writ petition for granting him compensation for acquisition of right of use of petitioner's land for laying a pipe line. According to him, the said acquisition took place without providing any compensation to the petitioner against the damage or loss sustained by him and without following the procedure.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3980 of 2020(3) dt.12-07-2022 2/2 At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that in case the petitioner files a representation before the competent authority within three weeks from today, it shall be considered and appropriate decision will be taken at the earliest, in any case, not later than four weeks. The decision should be in the nature of a speaking order.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Rajan Gupta, J) (Shailendra Singh, J) P. Kumar U