Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7131/2020dismissed

Akhilesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2020-05-29Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7131 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- SONNAGAR RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Akhilesh Chaudhary Son of Ram Pravesh Chaudhary Resident of VillageMohanpur, Police Station-Rafiganj, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Singh Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-05-2020 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Sone Nagar Rail P.S. Case No. 26 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner happens to be the husband of the deceased. Allegation against this petitioner is that he committed murder of the deceased and her child for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and thrown her dead-body near railway track. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The police

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7131 of 2020(3) dt.29-05-2020 2/2 found dead-body near railway track and recovered the deadbody and U.D. case has been lodged by the police on 19.05.2019. The present FIR was lodged after delay of 12 days. Other co-accused have been granted bail by the Hon'ble High Court. Petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2019 having no criminal antecedent.

Considering the fact that the petitioner happens to be the husband of the deceased who died within seven years of marriage in unnatural circumstantial circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T