Vinod Chaudhari @ Bullu Chaudhari @ Binod v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19821 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2020 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== VINOD CHAUDHARI @ BULLU CHAUDHARI @ BINOD SON OF LATE SRI CHAUDHARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARAYANPUR, P.S.- BARBIGHA, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2022 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 158 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. The alleged recovery is said to have been made a Hut.

Learned Additional P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19821 of 2021(2) dt.10-01-2022 2/2 named accused and there is recovery from his house. Petitioner, therefore, does not deserve to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T