Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10450 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1227 Year-2025 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Niranjan Kumar S/o Dinesh Rai R/o Village- Pokhara, Naya Tola East of Yadav Chowk, P.S.- Hajipur Nagar, District- Vaishali 2.
Niraj Kumar S/o Dinesh Rai R/o Village- Pokhara, Naya Tola East of Yadav Chowk, P.S.- Hajipur Nagar, District- Vaishali 3.
Priyanka Kumari @ Kumari Veena D/o Dinesh Rai R/o Village- Pokhara, Naya Tola East of Yadav Chowk, P.S.- Hajipur Nagar, District- Vaishali 4.
Kumari Pramila Devi @ Kumari Pramila W/o Dinesh Rai R/o VillagePokhara, Naya Tola East of Yadav Chowk, P.S.- Hajipur Nagar, DistrictVaishali 5.
Dinesh Rai S/o Late Gulel Rai R/o Village- Pokhara, Naya Tola East of Yadav Chowk, P.S.- Hajipur Nagar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Apurv Harsh, Advocate.
Mr. Manu Tripurari, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP.
For the Informant :
Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Vaishali Town P.S. Case No. 1227 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., all the accused persons assaulted the informant and his wife causing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10450 of 2026(6) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 injuries on their head and other parts of the body.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the case. The petitioners in their self defence might have caused some injury on the informant's side which was not intentional. Both the sides sustained injury in the occurrence. The injuries sustained by the victims are simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties.
5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the F.I.R. and the fact that the petitioners in their self defence might have caused some injury on the informant's side which was not intentional and the injures sustained by the victims are simple in nature, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10450 of 2026(6) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali in connection with Vaishali Town P.S. Case No. 1227 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.
7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.
8. The bail application stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T