Suman Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8711 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Suman Kumari D/o Ramadhar Yadav Resident of Village- Hathaudi, P.S.- Hussainganj, District- Siwan 2.
Punam Kumari @ Gabbar @ Gabbar Kumari D/o Ramadhar Yadav Resident of Village- Hathaudi, P.S.- Hussainganj, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 351(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that these petitioners assaulted brother of informant, namely Hridyanand Chaudhary, with Hasua.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, simple maar-peet took place between the parties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8711 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 2/3 in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. As per F.I.R., these two petitioners are alleged to have assaulted brother of informant, namely Hridyanand Chaudhary, by means of Hasua, however, as per injury report of Hridyanand Chaudhary, he has sustained injuries caused by hard and blunt substance. Thus, the injury report does not corroborate the allegation of assault levelled against these petitioners. Petitioners are ladies and claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials that have surfaced during course of investigation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Siwan in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 89
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8711 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T