← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8249/2019bail granted

Ravi Kumar Ram @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-15Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8249 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-673 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR RAM @ RAVI KUMAR, S/o Rajendra Prasad Ram, R/o Village- P.O. Kanharia, Ward no.14, P.S- Dagrua, District-Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Ranjan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 15-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 673 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354/354A, 354D, 506 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication of the petitioner because on 17.04.2018 the petitioner had given a written application to the Superintendent of Police, Purnea against the son of the informant stating inter alia that the petitioner's cycle has been stolen away by the informant's son. It is further submitted that the informant happens to be the cousin brother of the petitioner's brother-in-law, so they are relatives, the daugher of the informant is major and case in question has been lodged

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8249 of 2019(2) dt.15-02-2019 2/2 under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code by making baseless allegations that the petitioner was having bad eyes against the daughter of the informant. The mobile number provided in the FIR is that of the son of the informant and not of the daughter. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail, however, considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the relationship between the parties and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, in case of arrest or surrender of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, the abovenamed petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfication of the learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 673 of 2018, subject to the condition that he will abide by the conditions prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T