Janki Nath Sahni And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17538 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Janki Nath Sahni Son of Late Chedi Sahni, 2.

Md. Nasrullah, Son of Late Suleman, 3.

Ambho Yadav @ Dharmendra Yadav, Son of Late Bandelal Yadav, 4.

Om Prakash Sahni, Son of Janki Nath Sahni, 5.

Ramsaran Yada, Son of Bandelal Yadav, 6.

Darambir Prasad Arya, Son of Sahdev Prasad Arya, All are resident of Village- Rampur Gogri, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria, Pin Code- 851203. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Gramin Vikash, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Commissioner cum Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Divisional Commissioner, Munger.

6.

Engineer in Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

District Magistrate, Khagaria.

8.

District Development Commissioner, Khagaria.

9.

Subdivisional Officer, Gogri, Khagaria.

10.

District and Reforms Officer, Khagaria cum Land Acquisition Officer, Khagaria.

11.

Rakesh Kumar, Subdivisional Public Grievance Ramedy Officer, Gogri, Khagaria.

12.

Block Circle Officer, Gogri, Khagaria.

13.

Executive Engineer, Road PWD, Khagaria.

14.

Executive Engineer Road Construction Rural Development Department, Khagaria.

15.

Krishna Nand Yadav, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Rampur Gogri, Khagaria.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sushil Kumar, GP-22 Mr. Uday Prasad, AC to GP-22

Patna High Court CWJC No.17538 of 2017(2) dt.24-04-2023 2/2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-04-2023 Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioners, hence, it appears that the petitioners have got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U