← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10263/2025bail granted

Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10263 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2024 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar S/o- Munna Dhanuk Resident of village- Sahpur PS- Sahpur District-Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Sahpur PS. Case No. 391 of 2024 dated 16.12.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

3. As per allegation, total 11.36 liters of country made liquor has been recovered from open space situated in front of the house of Munna Dhanuk.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery has been made from open space and the petitioner has no connection with it. He further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10263 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025 2/3 submits that besides the hearsay, there is no material against the petitioner which could connect him with the alleged offence.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner has been made accused in one other case in which he is on bail.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Court No.2, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Sahpur PS. Case No. 391 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.PC and on the following conditions: (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10263 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025 3/3 below that the petitioner has criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T