← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9377/2022bail granted

Tausif Raja @ Baba @ Gulam Mustafa v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-11Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9377 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2021 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Tausif Raja @ Baba @ Gulam Mustafa Son Of Sakil Ahmad @ Ahmad Hussain Resident Of Village- Badodih Tiliya, P.S.- Kodarma, DistrictKodarma (JHARKHAND) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 1820.25 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9377 of 2022(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 basis of disclosure made by the co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 1820.25 liters wine is recovered from the truck in question. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T