← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17458/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Shashi Bhushan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-08-04Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17458 of 2016 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Prasad Son of Late Rajendta Pandit Resident of VillageNaya Tola, Madhopur, P.O. and Police Station- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna, presently residing at Opposite C/30, Mitra Mandal Colony, Saket Vihar, Anishabad, Police Station- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Collector, Patna.

3.

The Additional Collector, Patna.

4.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Patna.

5.

The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registry Office, Barh, Patna. 6.

The Cirlce Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md.Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"(i) For directing the respondent authorities specially the Respondent no.2 i.e. the Collector, Patna to direct the Respondent No.6 i.e. the Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur to grant NOC to the petitioner regarding Sale of 2 Decimal Land of petitioner which is in the name

Patna High Court CWJC No.17458 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 of his Late father and rent receipt of the land is issuing up to date but due to wrong entry in the computer of office of the Respondent No.5 Sale deed/registry of 2 Decimal land who is in the name of Late father of the petitioner is not being executed by the office of Respondent No.5.

(ii) For all consequential relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled in course of hearing of this writ application."

3. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner should have move before the respondent no.3, the Additional Collector, Patna for the redressal of the grievance instead of invoking the writ jurisdiction.

4. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U