Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1416/2015bail granted

Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-16Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1416 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -31 Year- 2011 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Pramod Yadav, S/o Nago Yadav, resident of village - Narhaiya, P.S. - Chhatapur, District - Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 16-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code. Considering that after due investigation charge-sheet was submitted under Section 306 Indian Penal Code, let the Petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Sri S. K. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.31 of 2011, subject to the conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1416 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 2/2 petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T