Amardeep Verma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3596 of 2019 ====================================================== Amardeep Verma aged about 40 years (Male) S/o Sri Balkrishna Lal Das Resident of Village-Nirmali Ward No.5,Post and Police Station-Nirmali,Dist.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary-cum-Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Director, Mid-Day Mill Scheme,Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3.
The District Magistrate, Supaul-cum-Chairman,District Mid-Day Mill Scheme Committee,Dist.-Supaul 4.
The District Education Officer, Supaul 5.
The District Programme Officer, Mid Day Mill Scheme,Supaul 6.
The District Co-ordinator Mid Day Mill Scheme,Supaul 7.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nirmali,Dist.-Supaul 8.
Parmod Kumar Yadav S/o Anant Prasad yadav Resident of Village and PostKupaha,Police Station-Radhopur,Dist-Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the State :
Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP 27 Mr. Umesh Narayan Dubey, AC to GP 27 For the MDM :
Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-10-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction for quashing the order issued vide Memo No.
1971 dated 2.11.2018 under the signature of Respondent No.1 by which taking the Salter of a letter issued on 10.7.2018 petitioner's right as
Patna High Court CWJC No.3596 of 2019(4) dt.17-10-2022 2/2 guaranteed under Article-19 (i) (g) of Constitution of India has been denied in spite continuously agitating the said issue for not debarring for a business to a citizen on the ground of residence and further be pleased to quash the order issued vide Memo No.91 dated 3.2.2018 and Memo No.296 dated 11.4.2018 and letter No.885 dated 21.5.2018 by which arbitrarily against the right guaranteed to the petitioner by the Constitution of India is claimed for allotment of the tender being a L-1 has been denied."
On 11.10.2022, we had passed the following order: "Sri Prabhakar Jha, learned GP-27, states that the present petition has become infructuous. Despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned.
List on 17.10.2022, in the category of "Order Matters".
Even today, despite repeated calls and pass over, none appears for the petitioner.
Petition is dismissed for default.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/- U