Md. Sagir @ Md Sagir Nadaf v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9536 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2025 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Md. Sagir @ Md Sagir Nadaf, S/o Md. Guljar @ Guljar, Residents of Village- Chausima, Ward No. 6, PS- Musrigharari, District- Samastipur 2.

Md. Sabir @ Md. Sabir Nadaf, S/o Md. Guljar @ Guljar, Residents of Village- Chausima, Ward No. 6, PS- Musrigharari, District- Samastipur 3.

Md. Masum @ Md. Masum Nadaf, S/o Md. Mosim, Residents of Village - Chausima, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Musrigharari, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned APP for the State is present.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 169 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 191(2), 190, 74, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, all the accused persons including the petitioner, with a common intention to kill, had brutally assaulted the informant and his family members causing injury.

4. I have perused the allegation made in the FIR, as well as, the case diary, from which, it appears that specif allegation of assaulting the son of the informant causing head

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9536 of 2026(4) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 injury is against petitioner no. 3. Accordingly, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 3 on pre-arrest bail.

5. So far as petitioners no. 1 and 2 are concerned, in absence of any specific allegation against them, they are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District Court where the case is pending, in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 169 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

6. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners no. 1 and 2 as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioners no. 1 and 2 as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

7. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T