Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14760/2026bail rejected

Shamshad Ahmad @ Shamshad Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-01Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14760 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== Shamshad Ahmad @ Shamshad Ali S/O Manzoor Alam Resident of VillgeNaya Kila Nawalpur, P.S.-Siwan Town, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Narain, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Md Irshad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2026

1. Heard the parties.

2. This is second anticipatory bail application on behalf of the petitioner who apprehends his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 413 of 2024 dated 11.08.2024 registered under Section 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case on 10.08.2024 at about 05:00 O'clock the informant was feeding the cow at his door in the meanwhile petitioner along with licensee pistol in his hand came at the informant's door and fired upon the informant with intention to kill him but the bullet did not hit the informant. Thereafter, petitioner assaulted the informant on his head by means of butt of the pistol. It is further alleged that when

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14760 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026 2/2 Sanjeet Yadav came for rescue of the informant, both the sons of the petitioner assaulted him. Thereafter, accused persons threatened the informant and fled away.

4. Mr. Rajendra Narain, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case of Arms Act against the petitioner has been found false by the police therefore this is a subsequent event. Accordingly, second anticipatory bail application has been filed.

5. This court had passed a detailed order after hearing first anticipatory bail application on merit and considering the ground that the petitioner is having six criminal antecedents of serious nature of offence and there is specific allegation against the petitioner of firing upon the informant with an intention to kill has rejected the bail application. By way of filing second anticipatory bail application, learned senior counsel tried to reargue the matter. Accordingly, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on a petition filed for the second time. The same is rejected.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U T