Surendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.430 of 2019 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16486 of 2016 ====================================================== Surendra Thakur, aged about 47 years, Male, Son of- Gola Thakur, Resident of village- Sashana, P.O- Bangra Phiroj, P.S- Baruraj, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Md. Sohail, The District Magistrate Muzaffarpur., District-Muzaffarpur.

2.

Miss. Priyadarshni, Sub Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur. Bihar. 3.

Mr. Bhaskar, The Circle officer, Motipur, Muzaffarpur. Bihar 4.

Mohan Sahni, Son of Late Sub Lal Sahani.

5.

Sohan Sahni, Son of Late Kublal Sahani.

6.

Kumod Sahani, Son of Late Gajadhar Sahani.

7.

Pappu Sahani, Son of Late Gajadhar Sahani.

8.

Raj Kumar Sahani, Son of Mohan Sahani.

9.

Dilip Sahani, Son of Mohan Sahani.

10.

Lakhindra Sahani, Son of Jagarnath Chaudhary. 11.

Harendra Sahani, Son of Late Kapildeo Chaudhary. 12.

Devnarayan Chaudhary, Son of Bachchu Chaudhary. 13.

Rupnarayan Chaudhary, Son of Bachchu Chaudhary. 14.

Gopal Thakur, Son of Late Gattan Thakur.

15.

Hardeo Thakur, Son of Gattan Thakur, Respondents No. 4 to 15 are Resident of Village- Sashana, P.O.- Bangra Phiroj, P.S.- Baruraj, District-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 30-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.430 of 2019(2) dt.30-01-2023 2/2 submits that during the pendency of the present contempt application, the order under contempt has been complied with and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for the State reiterates and affirms the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Arish/- U