Shakuntala Devi v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2787 of 2023 ====================================================== Shakuntala Devi, W/o Damodar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Mirachak, Maner, P.S. - Maner, Post - Maner, District - Patna, Pin - 801108, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Union of India through The Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Block No.- 1, CGO Complex, New Delhi. 2.

The Inspector General of Police, C.R.P.F. (Personnel), Block No.- 1, CGO Complex, New Delhi.

3.

The Inspector General of Police, C.R.P.F. Range Greater Noida, U.P. 4.

The Dy. Inspector General of Police, C.R.P.F. Range Greater Noida, U.P. 5.

The Commandant Head Quarter GC Greater Noida, U.P. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sagar Suman, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, CGC.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

2. The petitioner in the present case is seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the transfer of her son who is posted as Constable at Greater Noida in the State of U.P. to his Home District in Patna, State of Bihar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is 67 years old and her husband is 79 years old and they are critically ill, therefore, the transfer of the son of the petitioner be considered on sympathetic grounds.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2787 of 2023 dt.28-04-2023 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the son of the petitioner is posted at Noida in the State of U.P. where good medical facilities are available, therefore, he can take care of his parents while living at Noida. It is further submitted that the son of the petitioner has been transferred to Noida on 08.09.2022.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents, this Court finds no reason to issue any direction to the respondents to transfer the son of the petitioner in the home district, however, this Court would observe that in case the respondents have any policy whereunder they can consider the case of transfer of the son of this petitioner, the dismissal of this writ application shall not come in their way and the representation may be considered in accordance with the policies of the respondents.

6. This writ application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 28.04.2023 Transmission Date