Ramesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through It Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1472 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Ramesh Singh S/o Phulgen Singh, R/o Vill. Post Office- Neora, P.S.- Andhramath, Block- Phulpras, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through It Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate Cum Collector , Madhubani. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

5.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Phulpras, Madhubani. 6.

The Officer In Charge, Aandhramath Police Station, Block - Phulpras, District- Madhubani.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akash Chaturvedi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, learned AC to GP-5 for the State. Petitioner, in this case, is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to lodge a First Information Report against whom the petitioner has made complaint. He further prays for adequate security to him and his family as he apprehends threat of his life and liberty from the local villagers and family members of the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not followed the procedures required

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1472 of 2018(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 to be followed for purpose of lodging of the First Information Report. More than four and half years have gone by now and at this stage, to this Court, no threat perception could be primafacie shown. In the circumstances, taking note of the submissions that the dispute in this case seems to be between the petitioner and his daughter-in-law and the petitioner has not followed the procedures required, at this stage, this Court would not entertain this Writ Application. It is dismissed, accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U