Moti Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19022 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Moti Prasad, S/o Lakhan Prasad, R/o Nardiganj, P.O.- Nardiganj, P.S.- Nardiganj, District- Nawada at Present Asst. Teacher, Elevated Middle School, Jalalpr, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada.

2. Anil Pandey, S/o Kapildeo Pandey, Resident of Village- Handia, P.O.- Nardiganj, P.S.- Nardiganj, District- Nawada at present Asst. Teacher, Elevated Middle School Barail, P.S. Akbarpur, District- Nawada.

3. Mahesh Prasad Singh, S/o Sri Muni Singh, Resident of Village- Narhat, P.O.- Narhat, P.S.- Narhat, District- Nawada at present Asst. Teacher, Urdu Middle School, Pithori, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Nawada at Nawada.

5. The District Education Officer, Nawada at Nawada.

6. The District Programme Officer, (Estb.), Nawada.

7. The Block Development Officer cum Secretary Block Teacher Selection Unit, Akbarpur Block, Akbarpur.

8. The Block Education Officer, Akbarpur, Block, Akbarpur, Nawada. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Roy, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are aggrieved on account of nonpayment of their salary. Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are continuing as Assistant Teachers but they are not being paid their salary. He submits that the petitioners have already

Patna High Court CWJC No.19022 of 2017 (2) dt.22-12-2017 2/2 approached the concerned authorities for redressal of their grievance as such he further submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with direction to the respondent no.6 regarding payment of admitted dues.

In view of the innocuous prayer made by the writ petitioners, the writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioners to file a detailed representation before the respondent no.6 who shall look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass a reasoned speaking order on the representation, if any filed by the petitioners and also ensure payment of admitted dues within a period of one month from the date of filing of representation along with a copy of this order.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U