← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3581/2019disposed

Fakira Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-04Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3581 of 2019 ====================================================== Fakira Singh Son of Late Mahanth Singh resident of Village- Bariyarpur, Police Station- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Development Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4.

The District Co-operative Officer, Sitamarhi. 5.

The District Supply Officer, Sitamarhi.

6.

The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Sitamarhi. 7.

The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Patna through its Managing Director.

8.

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Patna.

9.

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd, Sitamarhi.

10.

The Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Sitamarhi through its Managing Director.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-07-2019 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to seek his remedy before an appropriate court in an appropriate jurisdiction.

Permission is granted.

This writ application is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy as may be

Patna High Court CWJC No.3581 of 2019(2) dt.04-07-2019 2/2 advised before the appropriate court. In case such remedy is applied for before any court or forum and a question of limitation arises the same will be considered keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case as also that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U