Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8557/2019bail granted

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-03-11Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8557 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2018 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR, aged about 22 years, (M) S/o Kail Yadav Resident of Village- Konch Bazar, P.S- Konch, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Veer For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Chandauti P.S. Case No. 116 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is of stealing the tractor of the informant, which was parked in front of the house of informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on suspicion. He is a person of unsound mind and was missing from his house. He is in custody since 09.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8557 of 2019(2) dt.11-03-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Class, Gaya, in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 116 of 2018, (Tr. No. 1210 of 2018), with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) manoj/- U