Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9623 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-749 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh S/o Late Niranjan Prasad Singh @ Bhola Singh Resident of - Gangiala, Ward No.-32, P.O- Saharsa, P.S.- Saharsa Sadar, DistrictSaharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Informant suspects that this petitioner along with other co-accused persons committed murder of his son. Informant believes that due to illicit relationship of his son (deceased) with accused, Doli Kumari, all the accused persons conspired and killed his son
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not a family member of the deceased and have committed no offence. Petitioner is the landlord of the brotherin-law and sister-in-law of the deceased, where the deceased used to frequently visit. Informant is not eye-witness to the alleged occurrence and has raised only suspicion against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9623 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 accused persons on the ground of illicit relationship between his son and accused, Doli Kumari. But as a matter of fact, son of the informant committed suicide by hanging, for which, U.D. Case No. 6 of 2023 was registered on 07.07.2023 and after lapse of one month, the present case has been lodged, in which, after investigation, police submitted final form, as 'Mistake of Fact', however, differing with the same, learned Court below has taken cognizance. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 749 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U T