Chotan Quraishi @ Md Noor Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9533 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-562 Year-2021 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

CHOTAN QURAISHI @ MD NOOR ALAM Son of Ilias Quraishi Resident of Village- Bajarkar, P.S.- Barachatty, District- Gaya. 2.

Badku Quraishi @ Md. Saddam Son of Ilias Quraishi Resident of VillageBajarkar, P.S.- Barachatty, District- Gaya. 3.

Chotku Quraishi @ Md. Shah Alam Son of Ilias Quraishi Resident of Village- Bajarkar, P.S.- Barachatty, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Soni Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Barachatty P.S. Case no. 562 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 326, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. And 27 Arms Act. As per allegation in the FIR, while the children were playing and informant was there, suddenly several accused persons including the petitioner came there and opened fire on Rahid Alam as a result of which he received bullet injury in his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9533 of 2022(2) dt.11-08-2022 2/3 thigh. Thereafter informant and children tried to flee away but they surrounded them and co-accused Anjar Quraishi opened fire which hit leg of Sabi Alam and other accused persons started indiscriminate firing. Co-accused Danish Quarishi and Afat Quarishi threw bomb on prosecution party. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. There is case and counter case. Members of both party have received injuries. Specific allegation of opening fire and hurling bomb is not against the petitioners rather general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Barachatty P.S. Case no. 562 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9533 of 2022(2) dt.11-08-2022 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Sherghatti, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U