Ranjeet Mistry @ Ranjit Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49799 of 2015 (3) dt.11-12-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49799 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2014 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Mistry @ Ranjit Kumar Sharma Son of Rajendra Mistry Resident of Village - Magrar, P.S. - Laxmipur, District - Jamui. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Kumar Uday Pratap (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 230 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 326, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, Vishnu Priya Yadav, the elder Bhabhi of the informant, was killed by 6-7 miscreants and they have covered their faces but it appears that the petitioner was involved in the group and further due to land dispute the hands of other coaccused may be there and the hands of sister and brother-in-law also appears in the crime.

Submission is of false implication and that except suspicion nothing has come during investigation. Other co-accused have been allowed pre-arrest bail by another co-ordinate Bench of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49799 of 2015 (3) dt.11-12-2015 this Court and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 21.09.2015 having no criminal antecedent. He has voluntarily surrendered in the light of observation of this Court, in this case chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

Learned APP after going through the case diary fairly submits that except suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 230 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T