← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10390/2025bail granted

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-31Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10390 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2024 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Chaudhary S/o- Lare Suresh Chaudhary VillagePachamba P S-Moffasil District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 424 of 2024 dated 27.06.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants ridden on a motorcycle hit the informant from behind due to which he fell down on the ground after which they snatched the informant's motorcycle, phone, cash of Rs. 35,000/- and headphone.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner was transpired in this case only on the confessional statement of the co-accused person.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10390 of 2025(4) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 18.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25670/2024. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on the record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 424 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T