← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17002/2017dismiss for nonprosecution

Rani Devi v. The Chairman, Bihar Gramin Bank And ORS

2025-06-24Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17002 of 2017 ====================================================== Rani Devi wife of Birendra Prasad Singh resident of Village - Jagatpur, P.O. - Kaswa, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Chairman, Bihar Gramin Bank and Ors 2.

The Regional Manager, Bihar Gramin Bank, Regional Office, Radha Rani Sinha Road, Adampur, Distt. - 3.

The Branch Manager, Shambhuganj Branch of Bihar Gramin Bank, At and P.O. - Shambhuganj, Distt. - Ba 4.

Baleshwar Prasad Singh S/o Sri Suresh Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Jagatpur, P.O. - Kawa, P.S. - Shambhuganj, Distt. - Banka. 5.

Niranjan Sah S/o Late Laxmi Sah resident of Village - Kaswa, P.S. - Shambhuganj, Distt. - Banka.

6.

Ashok Sah S/o Late Upendra Sah Resident of Village - Sahkund, P.S. - Sahkund, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025

1. This Court has passed a detailed order on 19.06.2025, which reads as follows:-

1. No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The Learned counsel for the respondents reported that the Writ petition is filed to quash the entire proceeding of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and also contended that the Writ petition is not maintainable.

3. However, for giving a fair

Patna High Court CWJC No.17002 of 2017(3) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 opportunity to hear the petitioner, list on 24.06.2025.

2. On the said day, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed for today as a last indulgence for giving a fair opportunity to the petitioner to hear the matter. In spite of it, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Amandeep/- U