Gudia Kuamri v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2815 of 2019 ====================================================== Gudia Kuamri age 23 years Female, W/o Pankaj Choudhary, D/o Sonelal Choudhary, R/o Village- Ward No.2, Karnauti, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar 2.

District Magistrate, Vaishali 3.

Child Development Project Officer, Karnauti Panchayat, Mahnar, Vaishali 4.

Sub Divisional Public Complain Redressal Officer, Mahnar, Vaishali 5.

6.

Mahila Paryveshika, Mahnar, Karnauti Panchayat, Vaishali District Programme Officer, Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== For the Petitioner/s :

Ms Rina Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr Gyan Shankar, GP II ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-05-2019 Petitioner's counsel is permitted to add District Programme Officer, Vaishali as respondent No 6. Matter has been listed today in the Summer Vacations as the learned counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.

The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May 2019, published prior to the vacation. Matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the Court for disposal of the matter.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

It is submitted that the petitioner is an applicant for

Patna High Court CWJC No.2815 of 2019(3) dt.28-05-2019 2/2 the post of Sevika/Sahayika under the Karnauti Panchayat, Mahnar in the district of Vaishali pursuant to the Advertisement published on 19.01.2018.

Petitioner's grievance is that in spite of her application, no steps are being taken for convening the Meeting of Aam Sabha so as to facilitate appointment of Sevika/Sahayika for the Center in question.

It is submitted that the petitioner would be approaching the District Programme Officer, Vaishali with her grievance.

In view of the said submission, parties are in agreement that final decision is taken by the District Programme Oficer, Vaishali.

In view of the said circumstance, pendency of the instant proceedings would be of no avail.

Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No 6.

It is expected that the issue will be resolved in accordance with law, expeditiously and without undue delay. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U