Veena Jha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2555 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Veena Jha W/o Anant Ram Jha, R/o Village- Gosaigaon, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur. 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur. 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur. 6.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur Town District- Bhagalpur. 7.

The Staion House Officer Mahila P.S., Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 14-12-2022 Prayer in this writ application is to provide protection to the life and properties of the petitioner and lodge a F.I.R. against the accused persons who have allegedly committed the offence whereunder they are said to have occupied the flat of the son of the petitioner forcibly in absence of the petitioner and her son by breaking lock of the flat.

Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP-5 for the State has drawn the attention of this Court wherein it is stated that one Nilu Kumari was living in the flat of Alok Kumar Jha who is her husband. She has lodged a case against the petitioner and others

Patna High Court CR. WJC No. 2555 of 2017(2) dt.14-12-2022 2/2 making allegations of torture, demand of wrongful confinement and attempt to murder. It was registered as Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 113/2017 under Section 341, 323, 307, 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is further stated that due to aforesaid annoyance and grudge, the present application has been filed by the petitioner and inquiry into the same revealed that it has been filed by the petitioner with an intention to harass Nilu Kumari and her parental side.

Having regard to the nature of the dispute between the parties and the statements present in the counter affidavit, this Court finds no reason to entertain this application. It is dismissed, accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U