Netesh Sada @ Nitesh Sada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9285 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2022 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

NETESH SADA @ NITESH SADA Son of Chandrika Sada R/v- Chanipura Mushhari Tola Ward No.- 7, P.S.- Pupri, Dist- Sitamarhi 2.

CHANDRIKA SADA Son of Late Sri Manjhi R/v- Chanipura Mushhari Tola Ward No.- 7, P.S.- Pupri, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 03-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 111 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant alleged that his daughter, aged about 15 years, went to nature's call but she did not return. Thereafter, the informant came to know that her daughter has been kidnapped by the petitioners on the pretext of solemnization of marriage.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are is innocent and have committed no offence. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9285 of 2023(2) dt.03-05-2023 2/2 have falsely been implicated in this case. From perusal of impugned order, the victim girl was recovered and her statement has been recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C., wherein, she did not support the prosecution version and stated that she solemnized marriage with petitioner no.1 Netesh. It is further submitted that good sense has been prevailed between the parties and in support of this, Annexure-2 has been annexed with this petition. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 26.9.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 111 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-VI, Sitamarhi. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T