Md. Gyas Uddin v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6889 of 2021 ====================================================== Md. Gyas Uddin S/o Late Md. Jalal Uddin, R/o Village Kakharwa, P.O. - Saur Bazar, P.S. - Baisa, District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India represented through the Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi.

3.

The Secretary, Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi.

4.

The Additional Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi. 5.

The National Council of Teachers Education, New Delhi represented through its Director.

6.

The Regional Director, National Council of Teachers Education, Eastern Regional Committee, 15 Nilkanth Nagar, Nayapali Bhuvneshwar, Orissa. 7.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

9.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 10.

The Bihar School Examination Board, through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 11.

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 12.

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 13.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Purnea Division, District - Purnea.

14.

The District Magistrate, Purnea, District - Purnea. 15.

The District Education Officer, Purnea, District - Purnea. 16.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment (Education), Purnea, District - Purnea.

17.

The Block Education Officer, Block- Baisa, District - Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dr. K. N. Singh ( Asg ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Patna High Court CWJC No.6889 of 2021(4) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been infructuous.

The writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 533 U