← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17686/2017disposed

Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-02-27Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17686 of 2017 ====================================================== Raj Kumar, Son of Anant Sharma, Resident of Village-Bagmali, P.O.-Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Town, District-Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 3.

The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

The Chairman, Nagar, Panchayat, Mahnar, District Vaishali. 6.

The Executive Officer-Cum-Secretary, Appointment Cell, Nagar Panchayat, Mahnar, District Vaishali 7.

The Principal, Government Girls High School, Mahnar, District Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar - GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, prayer as to reinstatement has become infructuous as the petitioner has been reinstated and he has joined the school.

Counsel for the petitioner has now confined his prayer for a direction to the respondents to pay salary from March, 2015 to 05.03.2018.

Considering the fact that the petitioner has now been

Patna High Court CWJC No.17686 of 2017(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 reinstated, the respondents are required to examine the record and if there is no lapse on the part of the petitioner, he should be paid salary for the period he was kept out of the employment or for the period he has actually worked. Necessary decision with regard to payment of salary for the aforesaid period must be taken by the respondents at the earliest, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt production of a copy of this order.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Rishi Kumar/- U