E. Srinivas Murthy And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9136 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4938 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

E. Srinivas Murthy S/o E. Jayanthu, Resident of Flat No. 201, Vijaya, Raghav Apartment, 4th Lane, Kadareswapete, PS- Ajit Singh , Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh) 2.

N. Shyamala Bai @ Shymla Bai Wife of E. Srinivas Murthy, Resident of Flat No. 201, Vijaya, Raghav Apartment, 4th Lane, Kadareswapete, PS- Ajit Singh , Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh) 3.

Shekhar S. @ Shekhar Son of S. Rathnaim, Resident of Flat No. 401 4th Floor, Opel Ground , GRK-II H.B. Colony, Main Road, PS- Vishakapatnam, P.S.-Vishakapatnam-3 Town, (Andhra Pradesh) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sri Sanjiv Sahay Son of Uday Shankar Sahay Resident of Mohalla- Lodipur, P.S. Budha Colony, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.11.2018 passed in Complaint Case No.4938(C) of 2017 by learned A.C.J.M., Patna whereby and whereunder the court concerned rejected the petition dated 27.03.2018 filed by the petitioners under Section 205 of Cr.P.C. for their dispensation from personal attendance.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that further proceeding in connection with Complaint Case No.4938(C) of 2017 pending in the court concerned has already

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9136 of 2019(12) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 been stayed in Cr. Misc. No.20332 of 2018 vide order dated 19.02.2020 which was modified on 23.06.2025 only with regard to the petitioners. Therefore, he submits that this case may be disposed of as it has now become infructuous.

3. In view of the above submissions, this case stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T