Amar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9015 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2021 Thana- SURYAPURA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Amar Paswan, Son of Late Jiut Paswan, R/O Village- Barun Tand, P.S.- Suryapura, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 388/2022 arising out of Suryapura P.S. Case No. 64 of 2021 dated 12.05.2021 registered for the offences punishable u/s 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons in connivance with one another are alleged to have hanged the daughter of the informant to death due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9015 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is the husband of the deceased. He has further submitted that the petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. The petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with S.Tr. No. 388 of 2022 arising out of Suryapura P.S. Case No. 64 of 2021. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T