Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2673/2015rejected

Gabbar @ Shyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-25Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2673 of 2015 (2) dt.25-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2673 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2013 Thana -KARJA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== GABBAR @ SHYAM KUMAR SON OF SRI RAMASHRAYA PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILL-MANSURPUR,CHAMARUA,P.S-KAJRA,DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR .... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renuka Ratnakar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 79 of 2013 registered under Sections 323, 341, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected on merit vide order dated 15.05.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8897 of 2014 by this Court and he is in custody since 03.09.2013. It is further submitted that, in fact, petitioner had lodged a case bearing Karja P.S. Case No. 89 of 2011 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2673 of 2015 (2) dt.25-03-2015 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 435 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3((i)/x of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act on 08.07.2011 against the deceased and other family members due to that reason the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case by the informant showing the name of the petitioner as the assailant of the deceased, out of three persons who boarded on motorcycle and shot fire at the head of deceased, brother of the informant.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T