Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50347/2015bail granted

Raju Patel @ Raju Kumar Patel v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-10Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50347 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2010 Thana -MOTIPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Raju Patel @ Raju Kumar Patel Son of Bashi Raj Patel Resident of Village- Birpur P.S Kanti , District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Bansh Dubey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C. Sen Pd. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No.607 of 2014 arising from Motipur P.S. Case No. 85 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is of causing the death of the brother of the informant.

The F.I.R. is against unknown and the involvement of this petitioner is on the basis of a confessional statement. Charges have been framed in the trial.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except for the confessional statement there is nothing on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50347 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 2/2 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions advanced, let the petitioner namely, Raju Patel @ Raju Kumar Patel be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IVth Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial No.607 of 2014 arising from Motipur P.S. Case No. 85 of 2010 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall be personally present before the trial court on each and every date fixed in the case and failure on the part of the petitioner to do so on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial court, would entitle the court concerned to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and to take him into custody.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U T