← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2662/2015bail granted

Pappan Khan @ Pappan Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-04Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2662 of 2015 (3) dt.04-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2662 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -334 Year- 2014 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Pappan Khan @ Pappan Mian Son of Kundan Mian Resident of villRamnagar,P.S-Muffasil,Distt.-Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Sheela Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In this case, petitioner is seeking bail in Nagar Case No. 334 of 2014 registered u/s 399, 402, 414 IPC and 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

Allegation has been made that Police on receipt of secret information raided the place and found that 4-5 persons were assembled there to commit a crime. When they were chased, petitioner was apprehended and from his possession a countrymade pistol was recovered along with Nokia Mobile and a motor cycle. Petitioner carries criminal history of ten cases over his head. Petitioner is in custody since 8th August 2014. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Pappan Khan @ Pappan Mian is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2662 of 2015 (3) dt.04-03-2015 or after 4th May 2015 on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Nagar P.S.Case No. 334 of 2014, subject to the conditions that : (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii) if the petitioner would be found involved in similar type of case in future, prosecution will be at liberty to file application for cancellation of bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iii) that the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding and if the petitioner will fail to co-operate in the proceeding of the court below and will remain absent for two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will pass appropriate order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

Jay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U