← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19203/2017disposed

Chandra Bhushan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19203 of 2017 ====================================================== Chandra Bhushan S/o Late Deepan Paswan R/o Village - Sarmastpur, P.O. - Chowk, Sarmastpur, P.S. - Sakara, District - Muzaffarpur, at present Assistant Teacher Utkramit Middle School Chakrawe, Maniyari, Circle - Sakara, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Programme Officer (Est.), Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt.Binita Singh -Sc28 Mr. Vivek Anand, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is covered by a decision of this court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6139 of 2007 dated 31.3.2011 and LPA No. 756 of 2015 dated 16.8.2017.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner in the light of decision in C.W.J.C. No. 6139 of 2007 dated 31.3.2011 and the decision of the Division Bench in LPA

Patna High Court CWJC No.19203 of 2017 (2) dt.19-01-2018 2/2 No. 756 of 2015 dated 16.8.2017. Such exercise must be completed by the respondents within a period of 60 days from today and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is similar to the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No. 6139 of 2007 dated 31.3.2011 and LPA No. 756 of 2015 dated 16.8.2017, similar treatment should be extended to the petitioner and the benefit arising out of such decision must reach the petitioner within a further period of one month from the date of such decision.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U