Md. Heera @ Heera @ Md Farid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9768 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2025 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.
Md. Heera @ Heera @ Md Farid Son of Md. Lal Resident of VillageBandhpura, P.S.-Katra, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.
Md. Nasir Son of Md. Lal Resident of Village-Bandhpura, P.S.-Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.
3.
Md. Mahmood Son of Md. Murtaja Resident of Village-Bandhpura, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.
4.
Taranoom Praween Wife of Md. Farooqh Resident of Village-Bandhpura, P.S.-Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The case has been taken up based on mentioning of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, as it has been submitted that the case was fixed for 3.30 P.M. but then on account of Reference at 3.30 P.M., the case will not be taken up, as such the case has been taken up at 3.10 P.M.
3. Learned counsel submits that the case was heard on 20.04.2026 and a detailed order was recorded. It is further submitted that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9768 of 2026(5) dt.25-06-2026 2/3 the informant alleges that her husband on 07.10.2025 at 8:00 A.M. had gone to the Court but did not return and his mobile was switched off, further few months ago, his agnates had threatened him of dire consequences, thus based on suspicion alleges that petitioner might have been involved in the abduction of her husband with an intent to commit wrong.
4. Learned counsel submits that thereafter the case was taken up on 14.05.2026. It is next submitted that on 14.05.2026, the case was directed to be fixed for 25.06.2026 at 3.30 P.M. and it was also recorded that if the victim is recovered on or before 24.6.2026, in that event, the appearance of the Investigating Officer of the case shall not be required, but if the victim is not recovered on or before 24.6.2026, in that event, the Investigating Officer of the case shall remain physically present before the Court. It is submitted that the victim has been recovered and the counter affidavit to that effect has been filed by the learned APP. It is also submitted that statement of the victim has been recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS, wherein he has not supported the case of the prosecution rather has stated that he had gone to Ghaziabad without disclosing to anyone.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State after perusing the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9768 of 2026(5) dt.25-06-2026 3/3 counter affidavit also fairly submits that the victim has been recovered and has not supported the case of the prosecution.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Katra P.S. Case No.260 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. At this stage, learned APP submits that soft copy has been filed online and the hard copy shall be filed by Monday.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T