← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5170/2024consigned

Sanju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-25Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5170 of 2024 ====================================================== Sanju Devi wife of Ranjit Kumar, Resident of Village- Mohalla Nashriganj, P.S. Danapur, District Patna, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, District- Patna.

3.

The Deputy Development Commissioner Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, District- Patna, Bihar.

4.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, District - Patna. 5.

The Zila Parishad, District - Patna through its Chief Executive Officer. 6.

Kumari Stuti, Wife of Ravimndra Kumar, resident of village - 80 Kandap, Sampatchak, P.S. - Gaurichak, District- Patna, Adhyaksh Zila Parishad, District- Patna, Patna.

7.

The UP-Adyaskha, Zila Parishad, District- Patna, Patna, namely Asha Devi, wife of not known, resident of Village and P.O.- Anandpur, P.S. - Bihta District- Patna, Bihar - 801103.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shantam Shivam, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vivek Prasad, Government Pleader 7 Mr Sudhanshu Bhushan, AC to GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- " 01. To issue an appropriate writ, order. direction in the nature of mandamus restraining in the respondent no. 3 not to call for the special meeting of Zila Parishad, Patna for discussing no confidence motion against the Adhyaksh proposed to be called for being based on a fraudulent and forged requisition dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.5170 of 2024(3) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 15-1-2024.

(ii) To hold and declare that the requisition dated 15-1-2004 is fraudulent for being based on forged signatures.

(iii) To issue an appropriate writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the authorities to not hold any special meeting of the Zila Parishad. Patna for discussing no confidence motion against the UP-Adhyksha.

(iv) To any other reliefs for which the petitioner appears to be found entitled by the Hon'ble Court."

3. In this case on 08.07.2024, four weeks peremptory time was granted to the petitioner to remove the defect(s).

4. As it was a peremptory order and was not complied with, it stands dismissed on 05.08.2024.

5. Perused the file, consigned.

(Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U