Anil Yadav @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10580 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65601 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2024 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anil Yadav @ Anil Kumar Son of Ram Bilash Singh Resident of VillageMeerpur, P.S.- Kutumba, Distt.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by an order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Cr. Mis. No. 65601 of 2024, with a condition that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was involved in Kutumba P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019 in which he was acquitted by judgment dated 21.03.2024. It is further submitted that Cr. Misc. No. 65601 of 2024 was filed by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10580 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/3 the petitioner on 04.09.2024 and since 04.09.2024 there was no case pending against the petitioner, as such, at para 3 in Cr. Misc. No. 65601 of 2024, the petitioner pleaded that he is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that bail bonds of the petitioner have not been accepted on the ground that petitioner was also implicated in Kutumba P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019, as such, he was carrying one criminal antecedent but then the learned counsel submits that the learned trial court also while refusing to accept the bail bonds has recorded that petitioner was already exonerated in Kutumba P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019. It is, thus, submitted that since petitioner was already acquitted in Kutumba P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019, as such, the petitioner on the date when he had filed Cr. Misc. No. 65601 of 2024 was a person with clean antecedent.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State is not in a position to rebut the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that if petitioner surrenders on or before 03.03.2025 his bail bonds shall be accepted forthwith.
6. The order dated 10.09.2024 is modified to the extent indicated above.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10580 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 3/3
7. Accordingly, the modification application is allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T